Let me eat cake!

Just another WordPress.com weblog

The Banking Fraud, a simplified overview….

THE MODERN INCARNATION OF FRAUD

What happens when you or I, or for that matter the government, borrow money from the bank? Prepare yourself for a surprise.

Let’s say we want to borrow a £100,000 mortgage on a house. The bank or building society does what the goldsmith did and creates £100,000 out of thin air. Instead of handing us a paper certificate, it simply credits our bank account with the £100,000 and registers that £100,000 as a debt, with (say) a further £100,000 interest over 25 years. The money is simply penned into our account without any account anywhere being debited the loaned money. New money is therefore created. Alongside it a debt (in this case £100,000 plus the roughly £100,000 of interest) is created. When we repay the debt, the interest is accounted as income for the bank. The £100,000 we originally borrowed is withdrawn from circulation and is accounted as collateral for further lending, loaned back into circulation when someone else borrows.

Our house is held as security so if we fail to keep up our repayments, the creditor takes possession of it. The repayments themselves can vary through no fault of our own, according to interest rates set by the banking industry.

After 25 years of blood sweat and tears we finally pay back the last installment of the £200,000 capital-plus-interest we owed and the house in finally ours. It is not ours until that point.

The lender, who loaned us money which did not exist until the moment he created it out of nothing, winds up with £100,000 of interest on the loan: that is real, spendable income that comes courtesy of our real work and real wealth creation. The numbers have been simplified to highlight the nature of the fraud and in practise the process is hidden under a great deal of complexity but this in essence is the process of money creation.

Each time the banks create money they create a debt that is greater than the spending power they create. One can see too that each time they are creating a debt for the borrower, they are ultimately creating debt free money for themselves.

Before the goldsmiths’ scam began, the money in circulation was hard currency – usually gold or silver minted into coins which then circulated as the tokens used to represent goods and services. That minting and circulation of coinage was usually administered by the government or king.

However as soon as the goldsmiths’ certificates became used in lieu of gold, paper money had made an appearance. As soon as the goldsmiths began issuing paper notes for gold they did not actually have, the goldsmiths were themselves creating new money and lending it into circulation.

One can see that this establishes debt as the basis of our currency. Where once, long ago, the British pound represented something -so much gold or silver – it now represents so much debt, which is not only nothing it is less than nothing.

Extracted from: Your Business Under Siege…and the reasons why. Published by the BAMR, email: BAMR@bamr.fsnet.co.uk Tel: 01342410962 (UK)

April 22, 2008 - Posted by cyncurry | bank fraud, cynthia curry, debt cancellation, financial freedom, home business, internet marketing, lifesuccessforyou, taxation, the ultimate entrepreneur, wealthfreedomfighters, work at home | | 3 Comments

3 Comments »

  1. This is interesting as I have a similar – if a little more moderate – view of this. When I buy something on my card and the money goes to the shop keeper, nothing actually moves anywhere. No physical money is moved – or possibly even existed. It is a virtual amount that is subtracted from my ‘balance’ and added to the shop keeper’s ‘balance’.

    This works well until we want to physicalise (sorry) what the ‘balance’ represents. It actually doesn’t exist which is what happened in a small way to Northern Rock i.e. a run on a bank.

    If we all wanted to cash in our balances, money would cease to have any value as there wouldn’t be enough to go round making the physical goods the most valuable – things like food and fuel and whoever controlled those would have the wealth.

    If you think about it for a while it is fascinating – we could bring to an end our entire concept of modern wealth just by using cash.

    Cool!

    Comment by Bill | April 23, 2008 | Reply

  2. BTW – as banks have a lot of their money tied up in investments, if everyone withdrew all their money the entire global economy would unravel and collapse sparking riots, war, famine and the ultimate destruction of the human race.

    How cool is that?

    Comment by Bill | April 23, 2008 | Reply

  3. What legal means of demand does a People have to reclaim title to their home, if the loan is based on the signature of the new owner, the home should not be encumbered.

    Second if the bank holds the title then shouldn’t they pay the owner interest, since the loan is based on a signature?

    Comment by Mick | May 1, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment